4.7 Article

Experimental study of wind-induced sediment suspension and nutrient release in Meiliang Bay of Lake Taihu, China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 14, 页码 10471-10479

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4247-7

关键词

Wind; Sediment suspension; Nutrient release; Shear stress; Experiment; Meiliang Bay

资金

  1. Chinese National Science Foundation [51179053]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project of Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2012ZX07101-010, 2012ZX0706007, 2012ZX07506-002, 2012ZX07506-006, 2012ZX07101-001-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wind-induced sediment suspension and nutrient release is an important source for shallow eutrophic lakes. This work studies the quantitative relationship between wind speed and sediment release rate in Meiliang Bay of Lake Taihu, China, using field observations and indoor simulations. Natural wind, water flow, and water quality conditions were synchronously monitored to establish the relationship between wind speed and sediment release rate. Sediment suspension processes under different wind speeds were also simulated in a specially designed reactor. We then established the relationship between natural wind speed and indoor-simulated sediment release rate through hydrodynamic conditions (expressed using water shear stress). The indoor experiment was a supplement to the field observations. The results showed that (1) the critical wind speeds at which sediment became suspended and demonstrated maximum suspension were approximately 3-4 and 8 m s(-1), respectively; (2) the relationship between wind speed and suspended sediment (SS), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorous (TP) release rate could be expressed by exponential functions (SS release rate: y = 1.287e(0.177x) , R (2) = 0.981; TN release rate: y = 37.55e(0.363x) , R (2) = 0.981; TP release rate: y = 0.381e(0.186x) , R (2) = 0.945); and (3) the critical (wind speed, 8 m s(-1)) release rates of SS, TN, and TP were 1000, 5.8, and 2.2 g m(-2) day(-1), while the maximum (wind speed, 16 m s(-1)) rates were 5000, 24.7, and 5.4 g m(-2) day(-1), respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据