4.6 Article

Silver Nanoparticle Modified Electrode Covered by Graphene Oxide for the Enhanced Electrochemical Detection of Dopamine

期刊

SENSORS
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s17122771

关键词

silver nanoparticle; neurotransmitter; dopamine; graphene oxide; electrochemical signal

资金

  1. Leading Foreign Research Institute Recruitment Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) [2013K1A4A3055268]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2016R1A6A1A03012845]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A6A1A03012845, 171S-4-3-1800] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease have become a serious impediment to aging people nowadays. One of the efficient methods used to monitor these neurological disorders is the detection of neurotransmitters such as dopamine. Metal materials, such as gold and platinum, are widely used in this electrochemical detection method; however, low sensitivity and linearity at low dopamine concentrations limit the use of these materials. To overcome these limitations, a silver nanoparticle (SNP) modified electrode covered by graphene oxide for the detection of dopamine was newly developed in this study. For the first time, the surface of an indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode was modified using SNPs and graphene oxide sequentially through the electrochemical deposition method. The developed biosensor provided electrochemical signal enhancement at low dopamine concentrations in comparison with previous biosensors. Therefore, our newly developed SNP modified electrode covered by graphene oxide can be used to monitor neurological diseases through electrochemical signal enhancement at low dopamine concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据