3.8 Article

Single-molecule fluorescence imaging of RalGDS on cell surfaces during signal transduction from Ras to Ral

期刊

BIOPHYSICS AND PHYSICOBIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 75-84

出版社

BIOPHYSICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.2142/biophysico.14.0_75

关键词

small G-protein; fluorescence microscopy; molecular clustering; protein translocation

资金

  1. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. MEXT, Japan [JP16H00788, JP15H02394, JP15KT0087]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K18533] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RalGDS is one of the Ras effectors and functions as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small G-protein, Ral, which regulates membrane trafficking and cytoskeletal remodeling. The translocation of RalGDS from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane is required for Ral activation. In this study, to understand the mechanism of Ras-Ral signaling we performed a single-molecule fluorescence analysis of RalGDS and its functional domains (RBD and REMCDC) on the plasma membranes of living HeLa cells. Increased molecular density of RalGDS and RBD, but not REMCDC, was observed on the plasma membrane after EGF stimulation of the cells to induce Ras activation, suggesting that the translocation of RalGDS involves an interaction between the GTP-bound active form of Ras and the RBD of RalGDS. Whereas the RBD played an important role in increasing the association rate constant between RalGDS and the plasma membrane, the REMCDC domain affected the dissociation rate constant from the membrane, which decreased after Ras activation or the hyperexpression of Ral. The Y64 residue of Ras and clusters of RalGDS molecules were involved in this reduction. From these findings, we infer that Ras activation not merely increases the cell-surface density of RalGDS, but actively stimulates the RalGDS-Ral interaction through a structural change in RalGDS and/or the accumulation of Ral, as well as the GTP-Ras/RalGDS clusters, to induce the full activation of Ral.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据