4.6 Article

Acoustic Sensing and Ultrasonic Drug Delivery in Multimodal Theranostic Capsule Endoscopy

期刊

SENSORS
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s17071553

关键词

ultrasound; capsule endoscopy; USCE; UmTDD; targeted drug delivery; theranostics; gastrointestinal; acoustic sensing; ultrasonic drug delivery; endoscopy

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K034537]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K034537/1, EP/K034537/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K034537/2, EP/K034537/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is now a clinically accepted diagnostic modality in which miniaturized technology, an on-board power supply and wireless telemetry stand as technological foundations for other capsule endoscopy (CE) devices. However, VCE does not provide therapeutic functionality, and research towards therapeutic CE (TCE) has been limited. In this paper, a route towards viable TCE is proposed, based on multiple CE devices including important acoustic sensing and drug delivery components. In this approach, an initial multimodal diagnostic device with high-frequency quantitative microultrasound that complements video imaging allows surface and subsurface visualization and computer-assisted diagnosis. Using focused ultrasound (US) to mark sites of pathology with exogenous fluorescent agents permits follow-up with another device to provide therapy. This is based on an US-mediated targeted drug delivery system with fluorescence imaging guidance. An additional device may then be utilized for treatment verification and monitoring, exploiting the minimally invasive nature of CE. While such a theranostic patient pathway for gastrointestinal treatment is presently incomplete, the description in this paper of previous research and work under way to realize further components for the proposed pathway suggests it is feasible and provides a framework around which to structure further work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据