4.6 Article

Nanoporous Gold Films Prepared by a Combination of Sputtering and Dealloying for Trace Detection of Benzo[a] pyrene Based on Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectroscopy

期刊

SENSORS
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s17061255

关键词

nanoporous gold film; surface plasmon resonance; benzo[a] pyrene; high sensitivity

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973) [2015CB352100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61377064, 61675203]
  3. Research Equipment Development Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [YZ201508]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A wavelength-interrogated surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor based on a nanoporous gold (NPG) film has been fabricated for the sensitive detection of trace quantities of benzo[a] pyrene (BaP) in water. The large-area uniform NPG film was prepared by a two-step process that includes sputtering deposition of a 60-nm-thick AuAg alloy film on a glass substrate and chemical dealloying of the alloy film in nitric acid. For SPR sensor applications, the NPG film plays the dual roles of analyte enrichment and supporting surface plasmon waves, which leads to sensitivity enhancement. In this work, the as-prepared NPG film was first modified with 1-dodecanethiol molecules to make the film hydrophobic so as to improve BaP enrichment from water via hydrophobic interactions. The SPR sensor with the hydrophobic NPG film enables one to detect BaP at concentrations as low as 1 nmol.L-1. In response to this concentration of BaP the sensor produced a resonance-wavelength shift of Delta lambda(R) = 2.22 nm. After the NPG film was functionalized with mouse monoclonal IgG1 that is the antibody against BaP, the sensor's sensitivity was further improved and the BaP detection limit decreased further down to 5 pmol . L-1 (the corresponding Delta lambda(R) = 1.77 nm). In contrast, the conventional SPR sensor with an antibody-functionalized dense gold film can give a response of merely Delta lambda(R) = 0.9 nm for 100 pmol . L-1 BaP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据