4.7 Article

Determination of physiological, taxonomic, and molecular characteristics of a cultivable arsenic-resistant bacterial community

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 18, 页码 13753-13763

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3840-5

关键词

Arsenic; Resistance; Bacterial isolates; Metabolism; Functional genes; Culture

资金

  1. French Ministry of Research
  2. EC2CO program (Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers, CNRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A collection of 219 bacterial arsenic-resistant isolates was constituted from neutral arsenic mine drainage sediments. Isolates were grown aerobically or anaerobically during 21 days on solid DR2A medium using agar or gelan gum as gelling agent, with 7 mM As(III) or 20 mM As(V) as selective pressure. Interestingly, the sum of the different incubation conditions used (arsenic form, gelling agent, oxygen pressure) results in an overall increase of the isolate diversity. Isolated strains mainly belonged to Proteobacteria (63 %), Actinobacteria (25 %), and Bacteroidetes (10 %). The most representative genera were Pseudomonas (20 %), Acinetobacter (8 %), and Serratia (15 %) among the Proteobacteria; Rhodococcus (13 %) and Microbacterium (5 %) among Actinobacteria; and Flavobacterium (13 %) among the Bacteroidetes. Isolates were screened for the presence of arsenic-related genes (arsB, ACR3(1), ACR3(2), aioA, arsM, and arrA). In this way, 106 ACR3(1)-, 74 arsB-, 22 aioA-, 14 ACR3(2)-, and one arsM-positive PCR products were obtained and sequenced. Analysis of isolate sensitivity toward metalloids (arsenite, arsenate, and antimonite) revealed correlations between taxonomy, sensitivity, and genotype. Antimonite sensitivity correlated with the presence of ACR3(1) mainly present in Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria, and arsenite or antimonite resistance correlated with arsB gene presence. The presence of either aioA gene or several different arsenite carrier genes did not ensure a high level of arsenic resistance in the tested conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据