4.5 Article

Intergenic disease-associated regions are abundant in novel transcripts

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1363-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship [APP1072662]
  2. EMBO Long Term Fellowship [ALTF 864-2013]
  3. Garvan Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Genotyping of large populations through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has successfully identified many genomic variants associated with traits or disease risk. Unexpectedly, a large proportion of GWAS single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and associated haplotype blocks are in intronic and intergenic regions, hindering their functional evaluation. While some of these risk-susceptibility regions encompass cis-regulatory sites, their transcriptional potential has never been systematically explored. Results: To detect rare tissue-specific expression, we employed the transcript-enrichment method CaptureSeq on 21 human tissues to identify 1775 multi-exonic transcripts from 561 intronic and intergenic haploblocks associated with 392 traits and diseases, covering 73.9 Mb (2.2%) of the human genome. We show that a large proportion (85%) of disease-associated haploblocks express novel multi-exonic non-coding transcripts that are tissue-specific and enriched for GWAS SNPs as well as epigenetic markers of active transcription and enhancer activity. Similarly, we captured transcriptomes from 13 melanomas, targeting nine melanoma-associated haploblocks, and characterized 31 novel melanoma-specific transcripts that include fusion proteins, novel exons and non-coding RNAs, one-third of which showed allelically imbalanced expression. Conclusions: This resource of previously unreported transcripts in disease-associated regions (http://gwas-captureseq. dingerlab. org) should provide an important starting point for the translational community in search of novel biomarkers, disease mechanisms, and drug targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据