4.7 Article

Experimental study of stable crumb rubber asphalt and asphalt mixture

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 975-981

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.164

关键词

Rubber asphalt; Storage stability; SMA; SBS

资金

  1. Open Fund of State Engineering Laboratory of Highway Maintenance Technology (Changsha University of Science Technology) [kfj160104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378006]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu [BK20161421, BK20140109]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242015R30027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to analyze the road performance of plant-produced crumb rubber asphalt (PRA) based on wet process by comparing with base asphalt, styrene-butadienestyrene (SBS) modified asphalt, and field produced rubber asphalt (FRA). Through infrared spectrum (IR) analysis and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) tests, the microstructure of each binder were analyzed and compared. Dynamic Shearing Rheometer (DSR) with different test modes were utilized to analyze the rutting resistance and fatigue property of each binder while Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR) test was used to analyze the low-temperature properties of each binder. Asphalt mixtures were prepared with different binders and the road performances including high-temperature rutting resistance, low-temperature cracking resistance, moisture stability and fatigue failure resistance were evaluated. The findings indicate that the plant-produced crumb rubber asphalt shows good storage stability and satisfied road properties compared to other binders while the asphalt mixture prepared with plant-produced crumb rubber asphalt shows satisfied road performances. In general, the study indicates that the plant-produced crumb rubber asphalt could be a promising replacement for SBS modified asphalt based on the mixture type evaluated. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据