4.5 Article

GROWTH PLATE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX-DERIVED SCAFFOLDS FOR LARGE BONE DEFECT HEALING

期刊

EUROPEAN CELLS & MATERIALS
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 130-142

出版社

AO RESEARCH INSTITUTE DAVOS-ARI
DOI: 10.22203/eCM.v033a10

关键词

Growth plate; Extracellular matrix; Scaffold; Large bone defect regeneration; Scaffold immune response

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [12/IA/1554]
  2. Health Research Board of Ireland [HRA_POR/2011/27]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [239685]
  4. Health Research Board (HRB) [HRA-POR-2011-27] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)
  5. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [12/IA/1554] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limitations associated with demineralised bone matrix and other grafting materials have motivated the development of alternative strategies to enhance the repair of large bone defects. The growth plate (GP) of developing limbs contain a plethora of growth factors and matrix cues which contribute to long bone growth, suggesting that biomaterials derived from its extracellular matrix (ECM) may be uniquely suited to promoting bone regeneration. The goal of this study was to generate porous scaffolds from decellularised GP ECM and to evaluate their ability to enhance host mediated bone regeneration following their implantation into critically-sized rat cranial defects. The scaffolds were first assessed by culturing with primary human macrophages, which demonstrated that decellularisation resulted in reduced IL-1 beta and IL-8 production. In vitro, GP derived scaffolds were found capable of supporting osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells via either an intramembranous or an endochondral pathway, demonstrating the intrinsic osteoinductivity of the biomaterial. Furthermore, upon implantation into cranial defects, GP derived scaffolds were observed to accelerate vessel in-growth, mineralisation and de novo bone formation. These results support the use of decellularised GP ECM as a scaffold for large bone defect regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据