4.3 Review

Small Prosthetic Groups in 18F-Radiochemistry: Useful Auxiliaries for the Design of 18F-PET Tracers

期刊

SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 474-492

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.07.001

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prosthetic group (PG) applications in F-18-radiochemistry play a pivotal-role-among-current (18)-Flabeling techniques for the development and availability of F-18-labeled imaging probes for PET (Wahl, 2002) (1). The introduction and popularization of PGs in the mid-80s by pioneers in F-18-radiochemistry has profoundly changed the landscape of available tracers for PET and has led to a multitude of new imaging agents based on simple and efficiently synthesized PGs. Because of the chemical nature of anionic F-18(-) (apart from electrophilic low specific activity F-18-fluorine), radiochemistry before the introduction of PGs was limited to simple nucleophilic substitutions of leaving group containing precursor molecules. These precursors were not always available, and some target compounds were either hard to synthesize or not obtainable at all. Even with the advent of recently introduced late-stage fluorination techniques for the F-18-fluorination of deactivated aromatic systems, PGs will continue to play a central role in F-18-radiochemistry because of their robust and almost universal usability. The importance of PGs in radiochemistry is shown by its current significance in tracer development and exemplified by an overview of selected methodologies for PG attachment to PET tracer molecules. Especially, click-chemistry approaches to PG conjugation, while furthering the historical evolution of PGs in PET tracer design, play a most influential role in modern PG utilization. All earlier and recent multifaceted approaches in PG development have significantly enriched the contingent of modern F-18-radiochemistry procedures and will continue to do so. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据