4.6 Review

Cell polarity and planar cell polarity (PCP) in spermatogenesis

期刊

SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 71-77

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.09.008

关键词

Testis; Planar cell polarity; Spermatogenesis; Sertoli cell; Blood; testis barrier

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NICHDR01 HD056034, U54 HD029990, LSK/14-15/P06]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) [GRF 17100816, GRF 771513]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)/RGC Joint Research Scheme grant [N_HKU 717/12]
  4. Hong Kong University Seed Funding for Basic Research
  5. The Fai Lau Memorial Fellowship
  6. The S.Y. Law Memorial Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In adult mammalian testes, spermatids, most notably step 17-19 spermatids in stage IV-VIII tubules, are aligned with their heads pointing toward the basement membrane and their tails toward the tubule lumen. On the other hand, these polarized spermatids also align across the plane of seminiferous epithelium, mimicking planar cell polarity (PCP) found in other hair cells in cochlea (inner ear). This orderly alignment of developing spermatids during spermiogenesis is important to support spermatogenesis, such that the maximal number of developing spermatids can be packed and supported by a fixed population of differentiated Sertoli cells in the limited space of the seminiferous epithelium in adult testes. In this review, we provide emerging evidence to demonstrate spermatid PCP in the seminiferous epithelium to support spermatogenesis. We also review findings in the field regarding the biology of spermatid cellular polarity (e.g., head-tail polarity and apico-basal polarity) and its inter-relationship to spermatid PCP. Furthermore, we also provide a hypothetical concept on the importance of PCP proteins in endocytic vesicle-mediated protein trafficking events to support spermatogenesis through protein endocytosis and recycling. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据