4.4 Review

A multicenter, open-label, comparative study of B-cell depletion therapy with Rituximab for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

期刊

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 625-631

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.10.003

关键词

Scleroderma; Systemic sclerosis; Rituximab; Interstitial lung disease; Fibrosis; B cells

资金

  1. Karathodori grant [D184]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Rituximab (RTX) may favorably affect lung function and skin fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). We aimed to assess long-term efficacy and safety of RTX in SSc compared to standard treatment. Methods: A total of 51 patients with SSc-associated interstitial lung disease were recruited and treated with RTX (n = 33) or conventional treatment (n = 18). Median follow-up was 4 years (range: 1-7). Conventional treatment consisted of azathioprine (n = 2), methotrexate (n = 6), and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 10). Results: Patients in the RTX group showed an increase in FVC at 2 years (mean +/- SD of FVC: 80.60 +/- 21.21 vs 86.90 +/- 20.56 at baseline vs 2 years, respectively, p = 0.041 compared to baseline). In sharp contrast, patients in the control group had no change in FVC during the first 2 years of follow-up. At the 7 year time point the remaining patients in the RTX group (n = 5) had higher FVC compared to baseline (mean +/- SD of FVC: 91.60 +/- 14.81, p = 0.158 compared to baseline) in contrast to patients in the control group (n = 9) where FVC deteriorated (p < 0.01, compared to baseline). Direct comparison between the 2 groups showed a significant benefit for the RTX group in FVC (p = 0.013). Improvement of skin thickening was found in both the RTX and the standard treatment group; however, direct comparison between groups strongly favored RTX at all-time points. Adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Our data indicate that RTX has a beneficial effect on lung function and skin fibrosis in patients with SSc. Randomized controlled studies are highly needed. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据