4.8 Article

Artificially controlled degradable inorganic nanomaterial for cancer theranostics

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 204-217

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.028

关键词

Degradable; Magnetic resonance imaging; Photothermal therapy; Nanotoxicity; Manganese

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21301121]
  2. Scientific Research Base Development Program of the Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [KM201410028008]
  3. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z131103002813097]
  4. Project of Construction of Innovative Teams and Teacher Career Development for Universities and Colleges under Beijing Municipality [IDHT20140512]
  5. Beijing talent foundation outstanding young individual project [2015000026833ZK02]
  6. Opening Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multifunctional nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis and therapy have recently prompted widespread concern. To avoid nanotoxicity, the development of novel degradable functional materials must be our main focus. In this study, we firstly developed ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid calcium disodium salt (EDTA)- and bovine serum albumin (BSA)-capped Mn3O4 nanoparticles (MONPs-BSA-EDTA) as a novel inorganic nanomaterials for multifunctional imaging-guided photothermal therapy, which can be degraded in a progress-controlled way by artificially introduced ascorbic acid. The degradation products can also be captured and their excretion accelerated. Careful studies suggested that the toxicity of the MONPs-BSA-EDTA and its degradation products is low. The degradation mechanism also suggests a new method of controlled drug release. The development of artificially controlled degradable inorganic nanomaterials also provides a new way to degrade nanomaterials and minimize ion release, which may have potential applications in cancer theranostics without nanotoxicity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据