4.4 Article

Administration of &ITLactobacillus johnsonii&IT FI9785 to chickens affects colonisation by &ITCampylobacter jejuni&IT and the intestinal microbiota

期刊

BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 373-381

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2017.1307322

关键词

Broilers; Campylobacter; competitive exclusion; Lactobacillus; microbiota; probiotics

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council [IFR/08/1, BB/J004529/1, BBS/E/F/00042559]
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/20231761, BBS/E/F/00044453] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/F/00044453, BBS/E/D/20231761] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Campylobacter jejuni Is the most common bacterial cause of human food-borne gastroenteritis In the world. A major source of human Infection Is the consumption of contaminated meat, particularly poultry. New control measures to reduce or eliminate this pathogen from the animal gastrointestinal tract are urgently required, and the use of probiotics as competitive exclusion agents is a promising biocontrol measure to reduce C. jejuni In the food chain. 2. In this study, we assessed the potential of Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785, which has shown efficacy against Clostridium perfringens, to combat C. jejuni. The effect of prophylactic administration of L. johnsonii on the ability of C. jejuni to colonise chickens was determined. 3. Two doses of L. johnsonii given a week apart led to a reduction in C. jejuni colonisation In the caecal contents, but this biocontrol seemed reliant upon a high level of initial colonisation by the probiotic. 4. The microbial composition in the chicken gut was significantly altered by the probiotic treatment, as shown by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. 5. Together these results demonstrate the potential of this probiotic strain to be tested further as a competitive exclusion agent In poultry against C. jejuni.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据