4.5 Article

Thyme oil (Thyme vulgaris L.) as a natural growth promoter for broiler chickens reared under hot climate

期刊

ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 275-282

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1828051X.2016.1245594

关键词

Broilers; thyme oil; growth performance; blood constituents; immunity

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [D-082-155-1437]
  2. DSR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to utilise thyme oil (TO) as a natural growth promoter in comparison to mannanoligosaccharides (MOS) for broilers raised under hot climates from 1 to 28 days of age. Thus, a total of 180, day-old broilers chicks were divided into five groups (36 broilers/group in 6 replicates of 6 broilers/replicate). The chickens were fed the same corn-soybean meal basal diet and were submitted to one of the following five dietary treatments: (a) positive control group, fed the basal diet supplemented with MOS at 1g/kg feed; (b) negative control group, fed the basal diet without supplementation; (c) thyme oil 1.0 (TO_ 1.0) group fed TO at 1.0 g/kg feed, (d) thyme oil 1.5 (TO_ 1.5) group fed TO at 1.5 g/kg feed and (e) thyme oil 2.0 (TO_ 2.0) group fed TO at 2.0 g/kg feed. The TO_ 1.0 displayed a better feed conversion ratio (FCR) than did the other treatments (p< .01). The MOS, TO_ 1.5 and TO_ 2.0 groups had higher (p< .01) plasma total protein than the control, and TO_ 1.5 also increased plasma globulin (p< .01) compared to the control, but decreased plasma albumin/globulin ratio. Moreover, the TO groups significantly decreased the plasma AST. Groups on the MOS and TO_ 1.0 diets showed higher (p< .01) white blood cells (WBCs) than the other groups. In addition, the MOS and TO_ 2.0 groups exhibited a greater (p< .01) antibody titre to infectious bursa disease (IBD) than the control group. In conclusion, TO at 1.0 g/kg diet may be used as a potential growth enhancer for broilers in hot region during 1-28 days.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据