4.5 Article

Requirement-oriented core technological components' identification based on SAO analysis

期刊

SCIENTOMETRICS
卷 112, 期 3, 页码 1229-1248

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2444-5

关键词

Subject-Action-Object (SAO); Patent analysis; Text mining; Technological components identification

资金

  1. General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [71673024, 71373019]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP140101366, DP150101645]
  3. International Graduate Exchange Program of Beijing Institute of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Technologies play an important role in the survival and development of enterprises. Understanding and monitoring the core technological components (e.g., technology process, operation method, function) of a technology is an important issue for researchers to develop R&D policy and manage product competitiveness. However, it is difficult to identify core technological components from a mass of terms, and we may experience some difficulties with describing complete technical details and understanding the terms-based results. This paper proposes a Subject-Action-Object (SAO)-based method, in which (1) a syntax-based approach is constructed to extract the SAO structures describing the function, relationship and operation in specified topics; (2) a systematic method is built to extract and screen technological components from SAOs; and (3) we propose a relevance indicator to calculate the relevance of the technological components to requirements, and finally identify core technological components based on this indicator. Based on the considerations for requirements and novelty, the core technological components identified have great market potential and can be useful in monitoring and forecasting new technologies. An empirical study of graphene is performed to demonstrate the proposed method. The resulting knowledge may hold interest for R&D management and corporate technology strategies in practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据