4.5 Article

Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology

期刊

SCIENTOMETRICS
卷 112, 期 3, 页码 1439-1469

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2452-5

关键词

Emerging technology; Synthetic biology; Bibliometric analysis; Search strategy; Map of science; Research sponsors

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M017702/1]
  2. National Science Foundation [0937591]
  3. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0937591] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. BBSRC [BB/M017702/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M017702/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synthetic biology is an emerging domain that combines biological and engineering concepts and which has seen rapid growth in research, innovation, and policy interest in recent years. This paper contributes to efforts to delineate this emerging domain by presenting a newly constructed bibliometric definition of synthetic biology. Our approach is dimensioned from a core set of papers in synthetic biology, using procedures to obtain benchmark synthetic biology publication records, extract keywords from these benchmark records, and refine the keywords, supplemented with articles published in dedicated synthetic biology journals. We compare our search strategy with other recent bibliometric approaches to define synthetic biology, using a common source of publication data for the period from 2000 to 2015. The paper details the rapid growth and international spread of research in synthetic biology in recent years, demonstrates that diverse research disciplines are contributing to the multidisciplinary development of synthetic biology research, and visualizes this by profiling synthetic biology research on the map of science. We further show the roles of a relatively concentrated set of research sponsors in funding the growth and trajectories of synthetic biology. In addition to discussing these analyses, the paper notes limitations and suggests lines for further work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据