4.6 Review

Phosphorus recovery and recycling with ecological engineering: A review

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 213-227

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.076

关键词

Nutrient recycling; Eutrophication; Phosphorus; Fertilizer; Nutrient management; Food systems; Human ecology; Waste management

资金

  1. Institute at Brown for Environment and Society (Brown University)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphorus is essential to life on Earth and frequently limits the productivity of ecosystems, including agroecosystems. Currently, a substantial portion of the global human population relies on finite phosphate rock resources used for chemical fertilizer production. Concern over poor management of these vital resources and continued efforts to enhance soil fertility and food security have stimulated interest in phosphorus recovery and recycling. Existing heterogeneity in phosphorus waste flows, agricultural phosphorus needs, the availability of resources, and spatial patterns of land use calls for a diverse array of phosphorus recycling strategies. Ecological engineers working on phosphorus management have most commonly aimed to create phosphorus sinks on the landscape to help mitigate eutrophication. There is a growing need for ecological engineering approaches that go beyond phosphorus retention to create pathways for phosphorus recovery and recycling, supporting both eutrophication control and food security. This review includes a brief overview of human impacts on the global phosphorus cycle and a survey of existing ecological engineering techniques for phosphorus recovery and recycling discussed in the literature. A systems approach for design and feasibility assessment of phosphorus recycling with eco-technology is outlined, along with several key challenges. The importance of an interdisciplinary, multiple element, and multiple resource approach to phosphorus recycling is emphasized. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据