4.1 Article

THYMOQUINONE ATTENUATES BRAIN INJURY VIA AN ANTIOXIDATIVE PATHWAY IN A STATUS EPILEPTICUS RAT MODEL

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 9-14

出版社

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP ZOO
DOI: 10.1515/tnsci-2017-0003

关键词

brain injury; Nrf2; oxidative stress; status epilepticus; thymoquinone; status epilepticus

资金

  1. Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Fund of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [2014JP007A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Status epilepticus (SE) results in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which contribute to seizure-induced brain injury. It is well known that oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in status epilepticus (SE). Thymoquinone (TQ) is a bioactive monomer extracted from black cumin (Nigella sativa) seed oil that has anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and antioxidant activity in various diseases. This study evaluated the protective effects of TQ on brain injury in a lithium-pilocarpine rat model of SE and investigated the underlying mechanism related to antioxidative pathway. Methods: Electroencephalogram and Racine scale were used to value seizure severity. Passive-avoidance test was used to determine learning and memory function. Moreover, anti-oxidative activity of TQ was observed using Western blot and super oxide dismutase (SOD) activity assay. Results: Latency to SE increased in the TQ-pretreated group compared with rats in the model group, while the total power was significantly lower. Seizure severity measured on the Racine scale was significantly lower in the TQ group compared with the model group. Results of behavioral experiments suggest that TQ may also have a protective effect on learning and memory function. Investigation of the protective mechanism of TQ showed that TQ-pretreatment significantly increased the expression of Nrf2, HO-1 proteins and SOD in the hippocampus. Conclusion: these findings showed that TQ attenuated brain injury induced by SE via an anti-oxidative pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据