4.7 Article

The absorption of iodine from 5-iodosalicylic acid by hydroponically grown lettuce

期刊

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 716-725

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.08.009

关键词

Iodine; Biofortification; Lettuce; Salicylic acid; 5-iodosalicylic acid; Organoiodine compounds

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to determine the effect of various doses of 5-iodosalicylic acid (5I-SA; organoiodine compound) on the growth, chemical composition, and efficiency of iodine biofortification of lettuce cultivated in a nutrient film technique hydroponic system. The additional purpose was to compare the impact of 5I-SA with the effect of a selected KIO3 dose applied separately or together with salicylic acid (SA). The following combinations were tested with the introduction of 51-SA and KIO3 (together with SA) into the nutrient solution: 1./ Control, 2./KIO3 (40.0 mu M I.), 3./KIO3 + SA (40.0 mu MI and 40.0 mu M SA), 4./5I-SA (1.6 mu MI), 5./5I-SA (8.0 mu M I), and 6./51-SA (40.0 mu MI). A strong toxic effect on plants was revealed only in the case of the highest iodine dose applied as 5I-SA (40.0 mu MI). In the remaining combinations, lettuce head weight and its phenotype did not differ from the control: However, an unfavourable effect of 40.0 mu MI applied as KIO3 on the chemical composition of plants (the content of sugars, phenolic compounds, and mineral nutrients) was not noted for 5I-SA applied in 1.6 and 8.0 mu MI doses. The values of iodine transfer factor for the latter two combinations were higher than after the application of KIO3 or KIO3 + SA. Application of KIO3 + SA increased the uptake and accumulation of iodine in lettuce leaves as compared to the treatment with KIO3 alone. A higher content of 5I-SA was noted in roots than in leaves. The obtained share of 5I-SA in total iodine content indicates that most of this compound is in plants converted into other speciation forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据