4.8 Article

Molecular remission of infant B-ALL after infusion of universal TALEN gene-edited CAR T cells

期刊

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 374, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaj2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH Research (NIHR)
  2. European Union FP7 [602239]
  3. NIHR [RP-2014-05-007]
  4. Wellcome Trust [104807/Z/14/Z]
  5. Cellectis SA [WO 02013176915]
  6. BBSRC [BB/N003853/1, BB/E005896/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/N003853/1, BB/E005896/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [W1105] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [NIHR-RP-R3-12-001, RP-2014-05-007] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Wellcome Trust [104807/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [NIHR-RP-R3-12-001] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autologous T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptor against the B cell antigen CD19 (CAR19) are achieving marked leukemic remissions in early-phase trials but can be difficult to manufacture, especially in infants or heavily treated patients. We generated universal CAR19 (UCART19) T cells by lentiviral transduction of non-human leukocyte antigen-matched donor cells and simultaneous transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN)-mediated gene editing of T cell receptor a chain and CD52 gene loci. Two infants with relapsed refractory CD19(+) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia received lymphodepleting chemotherapy and anti-CD52 serotherapy, followed by a single-dose infusion of UCART19 cells. Molecular remissions were achieved within 28 days in both infants, and UCART19 cells persisted until conditioning ahead of successful allogeneic stem cell transplantation. This bridge-to-transplantation strategy demonstrates the therapeutic potential of gene-editing technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据