4.7 Review

Reducing the global burden of HTLV-1 infection: An agenda for research and action

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 41-48

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.10.015

关键词

HTLV-1; Vaccine; Oncogene; Retrovirus; Leukemia

资金

  1. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS)
  2. Televie
  3. Interuniversity Attraction Poles (IAP) Program Virus-host interplay at the early phases of infection BELVIR
  4. Belgian Science Policy Office
  5. Belgian Foundation against Cancer (FBC)
  6. Centre anticancereux pres ULg (CAC)
  7. Fonds Leon Fredericq (FLF)
  8. AgricultureIsLife project of Gembloux Agrobiotech (GxABT)
  9. ULg Fonds Speciaux pour la Recherche
  10. Plan Cancer of the Service Public Federal
  11. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H05248] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Even though an estimated 10-20 million people worldwide are infected with the oncogenic retrovirus, human T-Iymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1), its epidemiology is poorly understood, and little effort has been made to reduce its prevalence. In response to this situation, the Global Virus Network launched a taskforce in 2014 to develop new methods of prevention and treatment of HTLV-1 infection and promote basic research. HTLV-1 is the etiological agent of two life-threatening diseases, adult T-cell leukemia and HTLV-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis, for which no effective therapy is currently available. Although the modes of transmission of HTLV-1 resemble those of the more familiar HIV-1, routine diagnostic methods are generally unavailable to support the prevention of new infections. In the present article, the Taskforce proposes a series of actions to expand epidemiological studies; increase research on mechanisms of HTLV-1 persistence, replication and pathogenesis; discover effective treatments; and develop prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据