4.5 Article

The lysine deacetylase Sirtuin 1 modulates the localization and function of the Notch1 receptor in regulatory T cells

期刊

SCIENCE SIGNALING
卷 10, 期 473, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aah4679

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Mouse Research Resource from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) [BT/PR5981/MED/31/181/2012]
  2. DBT, India [BT/PR13446/COE/34/30/2015, BT/PR11751/AGR/36/606/2008]
  3. NCBS
  4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India [09/860[0137]/2012-EMR-1]
  5. University Grants Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to tune cellular functions in response to nutrient availability has important consequences for immune homeostasis. The activity of the receptor Notch in regulatory T (T-reg) cells, which suppress the functions of effector T cells, is indispensable for T-reg cell survival under conditions of diminished nutrient supply. Antiapoptotic signaling induced by the Notch1 intracellular domain (NIC) originates from the cytoplasm and is spatially decoupled from the nuclear, largely transcriptional functions of NIC. We showed that Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1), which is an NAD(+) (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide)-dependent lysine deacetylase that inhibits NIC-dependent gene transcription, stabilized NIC proximal to the plasma membrane to promote the survival and function of activated T-reg cells. Sirt1 was required for NIC-dependent protection from apoptosis in cell lines but not for the activity of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL. In addition, a variant NIC protein in which four lysines were mutated to arginines (NIC4KR) retained anti-apoptotic activity, but was not regulated by Sirt1, and reconstituted the functions of nonnuclear NIC in Notch1-deficient T-reg cells. Loss of Sirt1 compromised T-reg cell survival, resulting in antigen-induced T cell proliferation and inflammation in two mouse models. Thus, the Sirt1-Notch interaction may constitute an important checkpoint that tunes noncanonical Notch1 signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据