4.7 Article

Unraveling sorption of lead in aqueous solutions by chemically modified biochar derived from coconut fiber: A microscopic and spectroscopic investigation

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 576, 期 -, 页码 766-774

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.163

关键词

Heavy metal; Biochar; Chemical modification; XAFS; SEM-EDX

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21467007, 21577131, 41271337, 41301228]
  2. Key Program of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [LZ15D010001]
  3. Special Funding for the Introduced Innovative RAMP
  4. D Team of Dongguan [2014607101003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we examined the efficacy of nine different types of coconut-fiber derived biochars (CFBs), prepared at different temperatures and chemically modified with ammonia, hydrogen peroxide and nitric acid, to remove lead. (Pb2+) from aqueous solutions. Langmuir-q(m) values of the biochars pyrolyzed at 300 degrees C and modified with ammonia and nitric acid increased from 49.5 to 105.5 and 85.2 mg g(-1), respectively, compared to control (unmodified), whereas hydrogen peroxide treatment had no effect. The maximum amount of Pb adsorbed on biochars was in the order of CFB-700 > MCFB-300-NH3. H2O > CFB-500 > MCFB-300-HNO3 > CFB-300. X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy results revealed that Pb-montmorillonite, Pb(C2H3O2)(2), PbSO4, Pb-Al2O3 and Pb-3(PO4)(2) were the five most important Pb species observed in Pb-loaded biochars, and as such, favoring Pb immobilization in aqueous solutions. Overall, the sorption capacity of CFBs pyrolyzed at 300 degrees C substantially increased for Pb2+ with ammonia and nitric acid modification. However, these chemical modifications did not improve the sorption of Pb on CFBs pyrolyzed at temperatures >= 500 degrees C, thereby highlighting a temperature dependent response of chemically modified biochars to Pb sorption in this study. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据