4.7 Article

Variation in arsenic bioavailability in rice genotypes using swine model: An animal study

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 599, 期 -, 页码 324-331

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.215

关键词

Arsenic; Rice genotypes; Arsenic speciation; Bioavailability of arsenic; In vivo assay; Human health risk

资金

  1. Global Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), Faculty of Science and Information Technology, University of Newcastle, Australia
  2. CRC CARE [PG080760]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in vivo assay using swine was used to measure the absolute bioavailability (AB) of As from cooked rice of twelve genotypes commonly grown in Bangladesh. An assessment of both total As in rice and its bioavailability is crucial for estimating human exposure following dietary intake by the local community. Average As concentrations in each rice genotype ranged from 108 4 mu g/kg to 580 6 mu g/kg. Arsenic speciation shows that most of the rice genotype contains 73 to 100% inorganic As. Swine were administered with As orally and via intravenous method, i.e. injection and fed certain common Bangladeshi rice genotypes (cooked). Swine blood As levels were measured to calculate As bioavailability from rice. Pilot studies shows that for As(III) and As(V), 90.8 +/- 12.4% and 85.0 +/- 19.2% of the administered oral dose was absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract whereas organic As was poorly absorbed resulting in low bioavailability values 202 +/- 2.6% (MMA) to 31.2 +/- 3.4% (DMA), respectively. These studies demonstrates that rice genotypic characters influenced As bioavailability in rice grown in As-contaminated areas and the bioavailability varied between 25% and 94%. Arsenic in salt tolerant rice genotypes Binadhan-10 and BRRI dhan47 as well as brown rice genotypes Kheali Boro and Local Boro has lower bioavailability (<50%) compared to other rice genotypes. The most commonly cultivated and-consumed variety (BRRI dhan28) has As bioavailability of 70%, which poses a significant risk to consumers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据