4.7 Article

An improved multi-objective optimization model for supporting reservoir operation of China's South-to-North Water Diversion Project

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 575, 期 -, 页码 970-981

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.165

关键词

Multi-objective optimization; Reservoir operation; Ecological water demand; Runoff guarantee rate; South-to-North Water Diversion Project

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51421065, 51439001, 51679008]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Program [2011BAC12B02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An improved multi-objective optimization model based on goal programming (GP) for supporting reservoir operation was developed under inflow senarios of multiple runoff guarantee rates (i.e., 25%, 75%, perennial mean, and 95%) and ecological goals with the combination of steady-and pulse-state ecological water demands. Under these four scenarios, discharge flows of Danjingkou Reservoir would be 358.40, 369.67, 268.91 and 98.14 x 10(8) m(3)/a, and those at Taocha Canal headwork would be 104.61, 86.62, 95.08 and 64.00 x 1(0)8 m(3)/a, respectively. The generated results for stream flows could successfully meet the predetermined operational goals for the project. Comparatively, under the scenario of 95% runoff guarantee rate, the obtained strategies could not satisfy the ecological water demands. The modeling results indicated that the capacity of water diversion and storage for Danjiangkou Reservoir would be enhanced due to the operation of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. The results showed the risks associated with possible flooding would be comparatively low under those four runoff guarantee rates. This represents the current priority for flood control in Danjiangkou Reservoir needs to be changed into multiple ones including ecological water supply, water transfer, as well as downstream water security maintenance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据