4.7 Article

Prometryn and humic acid induce Cytochrome P450 1A expression in Danio rerio (zebrafish)

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 40-47

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.09.011

关键词

Herbicides; HA; Zebrafish; Tissues; CYP 1A; EROD

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2012ZX07501-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humic acid (HA) is a major component of dissolved organic matter, is ubiquitous in the aquatic environment and influences the biological toxicity of organic pollutants. In this study, we investigated the cytochrome P450 IA (CYP 1A) mRNA expression and ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity in the gills and liver of zebrafish following exposure to the s-triazine herbicide prometryn with or without HA present. Prometryn induced both CYP 1A mRNA expression and EROD activity. The CYP lA mRNA expression of zebrafish that were exposed to a combination of prometryn and HA was increased compared to those exposed to prometryn alone. A likely cause for CYP 1A induction is the impact of special components of HA, functioning as aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) agonists. In combination with HA, these increase prometryn levels in tissues. Similar results for EROD activity were evident. In our time course study, CYP lA mRNA expression reached maximum values during 24 h. This revealed CYP lA mRNA transcription as a comparatively sensitive toxicity index. In a recovery experiment, we found a faster decrease of CYP lA mRNA expression to control levels (CK) in gills compared to liver tissue. Following exposure to HA, CYP 1A mRNA expression in liver tissue displayed a faster decrease to CK levels. HA induced enhanced metabolic rates for prometryn. In contrast, recovery regularity of CYP 1A expression in gills was independent of the presence of HA. This result indicates different detoxification mechanisms for HA in liver and gills. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据