4.7 Article

Impact of severe rain storms on soil erosion: Experimental evaluation of wind-driven rain and its implications for natural hazard management

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 590, 期 -, 页码 502-513

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.190

关键词

Soil erosion; Wind-driven rain; Splash; Experiments; Climate change

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [RI 835/3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prediction and risk assessment of hydrological extremes are great challenges. Following climate predictions, frequent and violent rainstorms will become a new hazard to several regions in the medium term. Particularly agricultural soils will be severely threatened due to the combined action of heavy rainfall and accompanying winds on bare soil surfaces. Based on the general underestimation of the effect of wind on water erosion, conventional soil erosion measurements and modeling approaches lack related information to adequately calculate its impact. The presented experimental-empirical approach shows the strong impact of wind on the erosive potential of rain. The tested soils had properties that characterize three environments 1. Silty loam of semi-arid Mediterranean dryfarming and fallow, 2. clayey loam of humid agricultural sites and 3. cohesionless sandy substrates as found at coasts, dune fields and drift-sand areas. Total erosion was found to increase by a factor of 13 to 7.1, depending on site characteristics. A complementary laboratory procedure was applied to quantify explicitly the effect of wind on raindrop erosion as well as the influence of substrate, surface structure and slope on particle displacement. These tests confirmed the impact of wind-driven rain on total erosion rates to be of great importance when compared to all other tested factors. To successfully adapt soil erosion models to near-future challenges of climate change induced rain storms, wind-driven rain should be included into the hazard management agenda. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据