4.7 Article

Degradation kinetics of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in surface waters: photolysis vs biodegradation

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 590, 期 -, 页码 643-654

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.015

关键词

Photolysis; Hydrolysis; Biodegradation; Kinetics; Pharmaceuticals

资金

  1. Consejeria de Innovacion, Ciencia y Empresa (Junta de Andalucia) [RNM 6613]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poor removal of many pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in sewage treatment leads to their discharge into the receiving waters, where they may cause negative effects. Their elimination from the water column depends of several processes, including photochemical and biological degradation. We have focused this research on comparing the degradation kinetics of a wide number (n = 33) of frequently detected PPCPs considering different types of water, pH and solar irradiation. For those compounds that were susceptible of photodegradation, their rates (k) varied from 0.02 to 30.48 h(-1) at pH 7, with the lowest values for antihypertensive and psychiatric drugs (t(1/2) > 1000 h). Modification of the pH turned into faster disappearance of most of the PPCPs (e.g., k = 0.072 and 0.066 h(-1) for atenolol and carbamazepine at pH 4, respectively). On the other hand, biodegradation was enhanced by marine bacteria in many cases, for example for mefenamic acid, caffeine and triclosan (k = 0.019, 0.01 and 0.04 h(-1), respectively), and was faster for anionic surfactants. Comparing photodegradation and biodegradation processes, hydrochlorothiazide and diclofenac, both not biodegradable, were eliminated exclusively by irradiation (t(1/2) = 0.15-0.43 h and t(1/2) = 0.14-0.17 h, respectively). Salicylic acid and phenylbutazone were efficiently photo (t(1/2) <3 h) and biodegraded (t(1/2) = 116-158 h), whereas some compounds such as ibuprofen, carbamazepine and atenolol had low degradation rates by any of the processes tested (t(1/2) = 23-2310 h), making then susceptible to persist in the aquatic media. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据