4.7 Article

Effects of warming and nitrogen deposition on CH4, CO2 and N2O emissions in alpine grassland ecosystems of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 592, 期 -, 页码 565-572

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.082

关键词

Greenhouse gases fluxes; Alpine grasslands; Climate warming; Nitrogen deposition; Qinghai-Tibetan plateau

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2016YFC0501906, 2012BAC01B02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increases in nitrogen (N) deposition along with climate warming can change the dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in the soil, and alter greenhouse gases (GHGs) fluxes. To examine how N deposition and warming affect GHGs (CH4, CO2 and N2O) fluxes in alpine grasslands, we conducted experiments in an alpinemeadow (AM), alpine-steppe (AS), and alpine cultivated grassland (CG) on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP). We simulated N deposition by treating soil with ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) (8 kg N ha(-1) year(-1)), a warming treatment using an open top chamber (OTC) was carried out, and a combined treatment of warming and N deposition (8 kg N ha(-1) year(-1)) was conducted. The GHGs were collected during early, peak, and late plant growing seasons, i.e., May, August, and October of 2015, respectively, using a static chamber. We found, in general, neither N deposition nor warming solely altered CH4 and N2O fluxes in the alpine grasslands. The N deposition under warming conditions reduced CO2 emission significantly. The reduction of CO2 emission was most significant in the alpine steppe. The effects of climaticwarming and N deposition on the GHGs varied greatly across the grassland types and the growing seasons. The cultivated grasslands were much more unstable than the native grasslands in CH4 uptake. In can be concluded the N deposition associated with human activities may buffer the CO2 emission in the alpine grassland ecosystems in terms of climate changes on the QTP. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据