4.2 Article

Socioeconomic disparities in quitting smoking and in steps on the smoking cessation pathway among smokers in Italy: findings from the SIDRIAT cohort study

期刊

ADDICTION RESEARCH & THEORY
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 63-70

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2017.1311876

关键词

Longitudinal study; socioeconomic status; smoking cessation; nicotine dependence; motivational factors; intention in quitting

资金

  1. Istituto Toscano Tumori [10.13039/501100003980]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The aim of this research was to examine socioeconomic disparities in quitting smoking and the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and steps in the smoking cessation pathway.Methods: We conducted an 11-year longitudinal cohort study examining the association between SES and quitting smoking among 721 current smokers at baseline. At the follow-up survey there were 466 smokers composed by those who continued smoking since baseline and those who began ore relapsed smoking. Among these we then studied the association between SES and steps on the pathway of quitting: nicotine dependence, motivational factors (expectancy of gains in quality of life after quitting; worries about health; favourable attitudes about smoking), beliefs about quitting (intention to quit smoking within the next 6months; self-efficacy), and past quitting history.Results: Smokers with fewer years of education were less likely to quit. Higher nicotine dependence was associated with lower education and with workers classified as managers and professionals, who were also more likely to record favourable smoking attitudes, and to have made 1 quit attempts. Manual workers reported lower self-efficacy in quitting, and were less likely to report 6months of abstinence.Conclusions: Higher education levels may predict quitting smoking over a long period. Interventions are needed to reduce dependence and to enhance self-efficacy in lower educated smokers, as well as to reduce favourable smoking attitudes among higher occupational classes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据