4.7 Article

Treatment of anaerobic digested effluent in biochar-packed vertical flow constructed wetland columns: Role of media and tidal operation

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 592, 期 -, 页码 197-205

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.125

关键词

High strength wastewater; Microbial community; Nitrogen transformation; Phosphorous removal; Tidal flow constructed wetlands

资金

  1. Research Fund for International Young Scientist [51650110489]
  2. Beijing Science and Technology Council Funds [Z151100001115010]
  3. National Key Technology RD Program [2015BAD211304]
  4. Beijing Nova Program [2015B083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three types of vertical flow constructed wetland columns (VFCWs), packed with corn cob biochar (CB-CW), wood biochar (WB-CW) and gravel (G-CW) under tidal flow operations, were comparatively evaluated to investigate anaerobic digested effluent treatment performance and mechanisms. It was demonstrated that CB-CW and WB-CW provide significantly higher removal efficiencies for organic matter (> 59%), NH4+-N (> 76%), TN (> 37%) and phosphorus (> 71%), compared with G-CW (22%-49%). The higher pollutants removal ability of biochar-packed VFCWs was mainly attribute to the higher adsorption ability and microbial cultivation in the porous biochar media. Moreover, increasing the flooded/drained ratio from 4/8 h to 8/4 h of the tidal operation further improved around 10% of the removal of both organics and NH4+-N for biochar-packed VFCWs. The phosphorus removal was dependent on the media adsorption capacities through the whole experiment. However, the NH4+-N biodegradation by microbial communities was demonstrated to become the dominant removal mechanism in the long term treatment, which compensated the decreased adsorption capacities of the media. The study supported that the use of biochar would increase the treatment performance and elongate the lifespan of CWs under tidal operation. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据