4.7 Article

Association between fine ambient particulate matter and daily total mortality: An analysis from 160 communities of China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 599, 期 -, 页码 108-113

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.010

关键词

Fine particulate matter; China; Time series; Total mortality; Air pollution; Health effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372950, 71403189]
  2. Key Scientific and Technological Project on Health of Tianjin [16KG170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Short-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter air pollution is associated with adverse health effects. However, existing literature have been limited in size and scope in countries with high air pollution level, especially in China. The study aims to examine the association of fine particulate matter with daily total mortality in 160 Chinese communities between 2013 and 2014. Two-stage analyses were used to assess the relationship between fine particulate matter(PM2.5) and mortality. Firstly, Poisson regression model was used to estimate the community-specific PM2.5-mortalty association. Secondly, a meta-analysis was used to pool the effect estimates within each region. During the study period, a total of 1.4 million deaths were recorded in 160 communities. There was a significant association between PM2.5 and mortality. Specifically, a 10 mu g/m(3) increase in 2-day moving average PM2.5 concentration on total morality corresponded to a 0.17% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10, 023) in national level. The estimate of PM2.5 on morality in Pearl Delta River was highest among Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regions, Pearl River Delta, and Yangtze River Delta. Females, older population and widowed population appeared to be more vulnerable to particulate matter exposure. Conclusively, this largest epidemiologic study of fine particulate matter in China suggests that PM2.5 is associated with increased mortality risk. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据