4.7 Review

Non-viral and viral delivery systems for CRISPR-Cas9 technology in the biomedical field

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 458-467

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-017-9033-0

关键词

genome editing; CRISPR; Cas9; viral vector; non-viral vector; gene therapy

类别

资金

  1. National Natural and Scientific Foundation of China [81602699, 81502677, 81402302]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA020309]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570791]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) system provides a novel genome editing technology that can precisely target a genomic site to disrupt or repair a specific gene. Some CRISPR-Cas9 systems from different bacteria or artificial variants have been discovered or constructed by biologists, and Cas9 nucleases and single guide RNAs (sgRNA) are the major components of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. These Cas9 systems have been extensively applied for identifying therapeutic targets, identifying gene functions, generating animal models, and developing gene therapies. Moreover, CRISPR-Cas9 systems have been used to partially or completely alleviate disease symptoms by mutating or correcting related genes. However, the efficient transfer of CRISPR-Cas9 system into cells and target organs remains a challenge that affects the robust and precise genome editing activity. The current review focuses on delivery systems for Cas9 mRNA, Cas9 protein, or vectors encoding the Cas9 gene and corresponding sgRNA. Non-viral delivery of Cas9 appears to help Cas9 maintain its on-target effect and reduce off-target effects, and viral vectors for sgRNA and donor template can improve the efficacy of genome editing and homology-directed repair. Safe, efficient, and producible delivery systems will promote the application of CRISPR-Cas9 technology in human gene therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据