4.7 Article

Screening cytokine/chemokine profiles in serum and organs from an endotoxic shock mouse model by LiquiChip

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
卷 60, 期 11, 页码 1242-1250

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-016-9016-6

关键词

endotoxin; septic shock; cytokine; chemokine

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81471901, 81272149, 181372030, 81671965]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory Construction Project of China [2014B030301044]
  3. Key Scientific and Technological Program of Guangzhou City [201607020016]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2015A030311031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying the cytokine profiles in animal models or patients with sepsis provides an experimental basis for the identification of diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. In this study, we used a liquid protein chip (LiquiChip), also known as flexible multi-analyte profiling technology, to perform quantitative analyses of several cytokines and chemokines (e.g., IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, keratinocyte chemoattractant, monocyte chemoattractant protein, monokine induced by gamma interferon, IFN-gamma-inducible protein 10, and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha). The levels of these cytokines and chemokines were determined both in the blood and in tissues, including the lung, liver, heart, kidney, spleen, brain, stomach, intestine and muscle, of mice challenged with LPS. Our data showed variable production levels of LPS-induced cytokines in different mouse organs, and the cytokine in the blood did not correlate with those in the organs. We also showed that the levels of most cytokines peaked within 1 to 6 h and decreased rapidly afterward. A variety of inflammatory cytokines might be related to the damage in different organs during septic shock. Our data also suggest that the spleen might be an important target organ in the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据