4.5 Article

Robust face recognition via discriminative and common hybrid dictionary learning

期刊

APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 156-165

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-017-0956-6

关键词

Face recognition; Sparse representation-based classification; Discriminative and common hybrid dictionary; Robust principal component analysis; Low-rank matrix recovery; Dictionary learning

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB329404]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572393, 11501049, 11671317, 11131006, 11301414]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20136118120010]
  4. Scientific Research Program - Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [13JK0583]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dictionary learning has recently attracted a great deal of attention due to its efficacy in sparse representation based image classification task. There are two main limitations of the Sparse Representation based Classification (SRC) for applications. One is that the training data is required to be less corrupted, and the other is that each class should have sufficient training samples. To overcome these two critical issues, we propose a novel approach, namely Discriminative and Common hybrid Dictionary Learning (DCDL), for solving robust face recognition. With the priori target rank information, the DCDL is able to recover a clean discriminative dictionary by exploiting underlying low-rank structure of training data. Simultaneously, the common intra-class variation dictionary is learned to make sure that a query image can be better represented by the collaboration with image variations of other classes. Extensive experiments on representative face databases show that the proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art sparse representation based algorithms in dealing with non-occluded face recognition, and yields significant performance improvements in most cases of occluded face recognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据