4.7 Article

Colistin Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 163-171

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix783

关键词

carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Klebsiella pneumoniae; colistin; ceftazidime-avibactam; benefit-risk

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy And Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UM1AI104681, R21AI114508, R01AI100560, R01AI063517, R01AI072219]
  2. National Institute of Allergy And Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) [10-0065, R01AI119446-01]
  3. Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland
  4. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences component of the NIH
  5. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research [UL1TR000439]
  6. NIH [K24-AI093969, R01AI104895, R21AI107302]
  7. Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs (from the Biomedical Laboratory Research AMP
  8. Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development) [1I01BX001974]
  9. Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs (Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center VISN 10)
  10. Research Program Committees of the Cleveland Clinic
  11. STERIS Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam-a cephalosporin-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with in vitro activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)-compared with colistin remains unknown. Methods. Patients initially treated with either ceftazidime-avibactam or colistin for CRE infections were selected from the Consortium on Resistance Against Carbapenems in Klebsiella and other Enterobacteriaceae (CRACKLE), a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Efficacy, safety, and benefit-risk analyses were performed using intent-to-treat analyses with partial credit and the desirability of outcome ranking approaches. The ordinal efficacy outcome was based on disposition at day 30 after starting treatment (home vs not home but not observed to die in the hospital vs hospital death). All analyses were adjusted for confounding using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results. Thirty-eight patients were treated first with ceftazidime-avibactam and 99 with colistin. Most patients received additional anti-CRE agents as part of their treatment. Bloodstream (n = 63; 46%) and respiratory (n = 30; 22%) infections were most common. In patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin, IPTW-adjusted all-cause hospital mortality 30 days after starting treatment was 9% versus 32%, respectively (difference, 23%; 95% bootstrap confidence interval, 9%-35%; P = .001). In an analysis of disposition at 30 days, patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam, compared with those treated within colistin, had an IPTW-adjusted probability of a better outcome of 64% (95% confidence interval, 57%-71%). Partial credit analyses indicated uniform superiority of ceftazidime-avibactam to colistin. Conclusions. Ceftazidime-avibactam may be a reasonable alternative to colistin in the treatment of K. pneumoniae carbapenemase- producing CRE infections. These findings require confirmation in a randomized controlled trial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据