4.8 Article

Does the Choice of NOEC or EC10 Affect the Hazardous Concentration for 5% of the Species?

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 15, 页码 9326-9330

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02069

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology, Japan [S14111016]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated if the choice of no observed effect concentration (NOEC) or a 10% effect concentration (EC10) affects the hazardous concentrations for 5% of the species (HC5s) estimated from species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). By reviewing available literature reporting NOECs and reanalyzing original toxicity data to estimate EC10s, we developed two SSDs for five chemicals (zinc, lead, nonylphenol, 3,4-dichlorobenzenamine, and lindane) based separately on 9-19 EC10s and NOECs. On average, point estimates of HC5s based on EC10s were 1.2 (range of 0.6-1.9) times higher than those based on NOECs. However, both EC10-based and NOEC-based HCSs estimated for five substances were on the same order of magnitude, and their 95% confidence intervals overlapped considerably. Thus, although EC10 was chosen as a representative of ECx in this study, our results suggest that the choice of ECx (e.g., EC5, EC10, or EC20) or NOEC does not largely affect the resulting HC5s. Therefore, use of NOECs would be acceptable particularly in regulatory contexts, although the NOEC has important shortcomings and should be used with caution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据