4.8 Article

Teaching personal initiative beats traditional training in boosting small business in West Africa

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 357, 期 6357, 页码 1287-1289

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aan5329

关键词

-

资金

  1. IZA-Institute of Labor Economics
  2. Women's Leadership in Small and Medium Enterprises trust fund
  3. Umbrella Facility for Gender Equality
  4. World Bank's Africa Gender Innovation Lab and Trade and Competitiveness Global Practice
  5. Innovations for Poverty Action
  6. Ministry of Commerce and of Private Sector Promotion of Togo
  7. Project Coordination Unit of the Private Sector Development Support Project
  8. WAGES (Women and Associations for Gain both Economic and Social)
  9. FUCEC (Faitiere des Unites Cooperatives d'Epargne et de Credit du Togo)
  10. CECA (Cooperative d'Epargne et de Credit des Artisans)
  11. APROMA (Action pour la Promotion du Monde Artisanal)
  12. DOSI (Delegation a l'Organisation du Secteur Informel)
  13. AFCET (Association des Femmes Chefs d'Entreprise du Togo)
  14. CRM-Lome (Chambre Regionale de Metiers)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Standard business training programs aim to boost the incomes of themillions of self-employed business owners in developing countries by teaching basic financial and marketing practices, yet the impacts of such programs are mixed. We tested whether a psychology-based personal initiative training approach, which teaches a proactive mindset and focuses on entrepreneurial behaviors, could have more success. A randomized controlled trial in Togo assigned microenterprise owners to a control group (n = 500), a leading business training program (n = 500), or a personal initiative training program (n = 500). Four follow-up surveys tracked outcomes for firms over 2 years and showed that personal initiative training increased firm profits by 30%, compared with a statistically insignificant 11% for traditional training. The training is cost-effective, paying for itself within 1 year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据