4.8 Article

Environmental Impacts of Surgical Procedures: Life Cycle Assessment of Hysterectomy in the United States

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 1779-1786

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es504719g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [ULI RR024153]
  2. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) [050434]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The healthcare sector is a driver of economic growth in the U.S., with spending on healthcare in 2012 reaching $2.8 trillion, or 17% of the U.S. gross domestic product, but it is also a significant source of emissions that adversely impact environmental and public health. The current state of the healthcare industry offers significant opportunities for environmental efficiency improvements, potentially leading to reductions in costs, resource use, and waste without compromising patient care. However, limited research exists that can provide quantitative, sustainable solutions. The operating room is the most resource-intensive area of a hospital, and surgery is therefore an important focal point to understand healthcare-related emissions. Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to quantify environmental emissions from four different surgical approaches (abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic) used in the second most common major procedure for women in the U.S., the hysterectomy. Data were collected from 62 cases of hysterectomy. Life cycle assessment results show that major sources of environmental emissions include the production of disposable materials and single-use surgical devices, energy used for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, and anesthetic gases. By scientifically evaluating emissions, the healthcare industry can strategically optimize its transition to a more sustainable system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据