4.7 Article

Evidence of an Upper Bound on the Masses of Planets and Its Implications for Giant Planet Formation

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 853, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa961c

关键词

spectroscopic; brown dwarfs; planets and satellites: formation; protoplanetary disks; stars: formation; stars: low-mass

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Celestial bodies with a mass of M approximate to 10 M-Jup have been found orbiting nearby stars. It is unknown whether these objects formed like gas-giant planets through core accretion or like stars through gravitational instability. I show that objects with M less than or similar to 4 M-Jup orbit metal-rich solar-type dwarf stars, a property associated with core accretion. Objects with M greater than or similar to 10 M-Jup do not share this property. This transition is coincident with a minimum in the occurrence rate of such objects, suggesting that the maximum mass of a celestial body formed through core accretion like a planet is less than 10 M-Jup. Consequently, objects with M greater than or similar to 10 M-Jup orbiting solar-type dwarf stars likely formed through gravitational instability and should not be thought of as planets. Theoretical models of giant planet formation in scaled minimum-mass solar nebula Shakura-Sunyaev disks with standard parameters tuned to produce giant planets predict a maximum mass nearly an order of magnitude larger. To prevent newly formed giant planets from growing larger than 10 M-Jup, protoplanetary disks must therefore be significantly less viscous or of lower mass than typically assumed during the runaway gas accretion stage of giant planet formation. Either effect would act to slow the Type I/II migration of planetary embryos/giant planets and promote their survival. These inferences are insensitive to the host star mass, planet formation location, or characteristic disk dissipation time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据