4.5 Article

Preschool children living in joint physical custody arrangements show less psychological symptoms than those living mostly or only with one parent

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 107, 期 2, 页码 294-300

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.14004

关键词

Children; Divorce; Joint physical custody; Parental separation; Psychological problems

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development, Vetenskapsradet
  2. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research
  3. VINNOVA - Gillbergska Foundation [259-2012-68]
  4. Lansforsakringsbolagens forskningsfond
  5. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research [2014-0843]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Joint physical custody (JPC), where children spend about equal time in both parent's homes after parental separation, is increasing. The suitability of this practice for preschool children, with a need for predictability and continuity, has been questioned. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used data on 3656 Swedish children aged three to five years living in intact families, JPC, mostly with one parent or single care. Linear regression analyses were conducted with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, completed by parents and preschool teachers, as the outcome measure. Results: Children in JPC showed less psychological problems than those living mostly (adjusted B 1.81; 95% CI [0.66 to 2.95]) or only with one parent (adjusted B 1.94; 95% CI [0.75 to 3.13]), in parental reports. In preschool teacher reports, the adjusted Betas were 1.27, 95% CI [0.14 to 2.40] and 1.41, 95% CI [0.24 to 2.58], respectively. In parental reports, children in JPC and those in intact families had similar outcomes, while teachers reported lower unadjusted symptom scores for children in intact families. Conclusion: Joint physical custody arrangements were not associated with more psychological symptoms in children aged 3-5, but longitudinal studies are needed to account for potential preseparation differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据