4.5 Article

Determinants of low risk of asthma exacerbation during pregnancy

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 23-28

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cea.13033

关键词

asthma; eosinophils; prevention

资金

  1. Danish Lung Association
  2. Amager and Hvidovre Hospital Research Foundation
  3. Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK)
  4. Grosserer L.F. Foght's Foundation
  5. Torben and Alice Frimodt's Foundation
  6. The Unit of Science Research and Innovation
  7. Global Excellence in Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundAssessment of asthma control every 4-6 weeks during pregnancy is recommended to reduce risk of exacerbation, and by that improve outcome. ObjectiveTo identify determinants of pregnancies with low risk of asthma exacerbation. MethodsAll pregnant women enrolled into the Management of Asthma during Pregnancy (MAP) programme at Hvidovre Hospital since 2007. Assessment of asthma control, adjustment of treatment, spirometry and measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) were performed, and baseline characteristics and exacerbation history were collected at enrolment. Determinants of low-exacerbation risk pregnancies were identified by logistic regression analysis (stepwise backward elimination). ResultsIn 1283 pregnancies, 107 exacerbations were observed. Multiple regression analysis revealed that no history of pre-pregnancy exacerbations (P < .001), no prescribed controller medication (P < .001), and clinically stable asthma at enrolment (P = .002) were significantly associated with low risk of exacerbation during pregnancy; with these combined characteristics, only two of 385 pregnancies were complicated by an exacerbation (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.18, P < .001). Conclusion and clinical relevanceClinically stable asthma at enrolment, together with no history of previous exacerbations and no prescribed controller medication, is a determinant of low risk of an asthma exacerbation during pregnancy, which may guide clinicians in individualizing surveillance of asthma during pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据