4.8 Article

Mechanisms of Neutral and Anionic Surfactant Sorption to Solid-Phase Microextraction Fibers

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 18, 页码 11053-11061

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02901

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW
  2. Ministry of Economic Affairs
  3. Deltares (Utrecht, The Netherlands)
  4. Environmental Risk Assessment and Management (ERASM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Octanol water partitioning (K-ow) is considered a key parameter for hydrophobicity and is often applied in the prediction of the environmental fate and exposure of neutral organic compounds. However, surfactants can create difficulties in the determination of K-ow because of emulsification of both water and octanol phases. Moreover, not only is sorption behavior of ionic surfactants related to hydrophobicity, but also other interactions are relevant in sorption processes. A different approach to develop parameters that can be applied in predictive modeling of the fate of surfactants in the environment is therefore required. Distribution between solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers and water was used in this study to measure the affinity of surfactants to a hydrophobic phase. Fiber water sorption coefficients of alcohol ethoxylates, alkyl carboxylates, alkyl sulfates, and alkyl sulfonates were determined at pH 7 by equilibration test analytes between fiber and water. Distribution between fiber and water of anionic compounds with pK(a) similar to 5 (i.e., alkyl carboxylates) was dominated by the neutral fraction. Anionic surfactants with pK(a) <= 2 (i.e., alkyl sulfates and alkyl sulfonates) showed strong nonlinear distribution to the fiber. The fiber water sorption coefficients for alcohol ethoxylates and alkyl sulfates showed a linear trend with bioconcentration factors from the literature. Fiber water sorption coefficients are promising as a parameter to study the effects of hydrophobicity and other potential interactions on sorption behavior of neutral and anionic surfactants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据