4.7 Article

Near-infrared to Mid-infrared Observations of Galaxy Mergers: NGC 2782 and NGC 7727

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 853, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa004

关键词

galaxies: individual (NGC 2782, NGC 7727); galaxies: interactions; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: star formation; infrared: galaxies

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. JSPS under the Japan-France Research Cooperative Program
  3. CNRS under the Japan-France Research Cooperative Program
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23244021]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23244021, 16H00934] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the results of near-infrared-to-mid-infrared (NIR-to-MIR) imaging and NIR spectroscopic observations of two galaxy mergers, NGC 2782 (Arp 215) and NGC 7727 (Arp. 222), with the Infrared Camera on board AKARI NGC 2782 shows extended MIR emission in the eastern side of the galaxy, which corresponds to the eastern tidal tail seen in the H I 21 cm map, while NGC 7727 shows extended MIR emission in the north of the galaxy, which is similar to the plumes seen in the residual image at the K-band after subtracting a galaxy model. Both extended structures are thought to have formed in association with their merger events. They show excess emission at 7-15 mu m, which can be attributed to emission from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), while the observed spectral energy distributions (SEDs) decline longward of 24 mu m, suggesting that very small grains (VSGs) are deficient. These characteristics of the observed MIR SED may be explained if PAHs are formed by fragmentation of VSGs during merger events. The star formation rate is estimated from the MIR PAH emission in the eastern tail region of NGC 2782 and it is in fair agreement with those estimated from Ha and [C II]. 158 mu m. MIR observations are efficient for the study of dust processing and structures formed during merger events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据