4.6 Article

Restrictions for reimbursement of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral drugs for HCV infection in Europe

期刊

LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 125-133

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30284-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. UNSW (Sydney, Australia)
  2. CanHepC Trainee Program (Canada)
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council
  4. Australian Government Department of Health
  5. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0515-10023, RP-DG-0610-10055] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-oral direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus, which have response rates of 95% or more, represent a major clinical advance. However, the high list price of DAAs has led many governments to restrict their reimbursement. We reviewed the availability of, and national criteria for, interferon-free DAA reimbursement among countries in the European Union and European Economic Area, and Switzerland. Reimbursement documentation was reviewed between Nov 18, 2016, and Aug 1, 2017. Primary outcomes were fibrosis stage, drug or alcohol use, prescriber type, and HIV co-infection restrictions. Among the 35 European countries and jurisdictions included, the most commonly reimbursed DAA was ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with dasabuvir, and with or without ribavirin (33 [94%] countries and jurisdictions). 16 (46%) countries and jurisdictions required patients to have fibrosis at stage F2 or higher, 29 (83%) had no listed restrictions based on drug or alcohol use, 33 (94%) required a specialist prescriber, and 34 (97%) had no additional restrictions for people co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus. These findings have implications for meeting WHO targets, with evidence of some countries not following the 2016 hepatitis C virus treatment guidelines by the European Association for the Study of Liver.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据