3.8 Review

What we know and what we think we know about microplastic effects - A critical perspective

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.09.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Joint Programming Initiative Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans (JPI-Oceans) WEATHERMIC project, Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS) [9422015-1866]
  2. FORMAS project
  3. ir-PLAST [2015-932]
  4. Swedish Innovation Agency VINNOVA [2017-00979]
  5. Vinnova [2017-00979] Funding Source: Vinnova
  6. Formas [2017-00979] Funding Source: Formas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microplastic pollution is currently perceived as an environmental hazard, and adverse effects have been reported at various levels of biological organization. However, most experimental designs do not allow plastic-specific effects to be distinguished from those caused by other particles, such as clay and cellulose, which are naturally ubiquitous in the environment. We suggest that microplastic effects reported in recent ecotoxicological studies are similar to those induced by the natural particles. To provide a sound basis for risk assessment, experimental designs must not only be able to disentangle the effects of food limitation and particle toxicity but also demonstrate whether microplastics cause impacts that differ from those induced by natural particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据