4.8 Article

Atmospheric Emission Characteristics and Control Policies of Five Precedent-Controlled Toxic Heavy Metals from Anthropogenic Sources in China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 1206-1214

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es5037332

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) of China of Beijing Normal University [40975061, 21177012, 21377012]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) of China of Xinxiang Medical University [21407122]
  3. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51125025]
  4. National Twelfth Five-Year Plan for Science & Technology Support of Zhejiang University [2012BAB18B03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A bottom-up inventory of atmospheric emissions of five precedent-controlled toxic heavy metals (HMs), including mercury (Hg), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and chromium (Cr), from primary anthropogenic sources in China is established for the period 2000-2010. Total emissions of HMs demonstrate a gradually ascending trend along with the increase of coal consumption and industrial production, which are estimated at approximately 842.22 t for Hg, 4196.31 t for As, 29272.14 t for Pb, 795.29 t for Cd, and 13715.33 t for Cr for 2010. Coal combustion is found to be the primary source of HMs emissions. Owing to the dramatic differences of coal use by industrial and power sectors among provinces, spatial allocation performs remarkably uneven characteristics, and spatial distribution features are demonstrated by allocating the emissions into 0.5 degrees x 0.5 degrees grid cells with GDP and population as surrogate indexes. Further, HMs emissions from specified anthropogenic sources under three different control scenarios for the target year 2015 are projected, and collaborative and specialized control strategies are proposed to meet the demand of emission reduction goals of different regions. In the future, a whole processes control management system will be the most effective way for control of HMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据