4.4 Article

Work-family conflict and depressive complaints among Dutch employees: examining reciprocal associations in a longitudinal study

期刊

出版社

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3658

关键词

conservation of resources theory; home-work interference; prospective cohort study; SEM; structural equation modeling; work-family balance; work-home interference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the reciprocal association between work-family conflict and depressive complaints over time. Methods Cross-lagged structural equation modeling (SEM) was used and three-wave follow-up data from the Maastricht Cohort Study with six years of follow-up [2416 men and 585 women at T1 (2008)]. Work-family conflict was operationalized by distinguishing both work-home interference and home-work interference, as assessed with two subscales of the Survey Work-Home Interference Nijmegen. Depressive complaints were assessed with a subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Results The results showed a positive cross-lagged relation between home-work interference and depressive complaints. The results of the chi(2) difference test indicated that the model with cross-lagged reciprocal relationships resulted in a significantly better fit to the data compared to the causal (Delta chi(2) (2)=9.89, P=0.001), reversed causation model (Delta chi(2) (2)=9.25, P=0.01), and the starting model (Delta chi(2) (4)=16.34, P=0.002). For work-home interference and depressive complaints, the starting model with no cross-lagged associations over time had the best fit to the empirical data. Conclusions The findings suggest a reciprocal association between home-work interference and depressive complaints since the concepts appear to affect each other mutually across time. This highlights the importance of targeting modifiable risk factors in the etiology of both home-work interference and depressive complaints when designing preventive measures since the two concepts may potentiate each other over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据