4.8 Article

Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials in Coals and Coal Combustion Residuals in the United States

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 49, 期 18, 页码 11227-11233

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01978

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1235661]
  2. Directorate For Engineering [1235735] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1235661] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1235735] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distribution and enrichment of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in coal combustion residuals (CCRs) from different coal source basins have not been fully characterized in the United States. Here we provide a systematic analysis of the occurrence of NORM (Th-232, Ra-228, (238)u, Ra-226, and Pb-210) in coals and associated CCRs from the Illinois, Appalachian, and Powder River Basins. Illinois CCRs had the highest total Ra (Ra-228 + Ra-226 = 297 +/- 46 Bq/kg) and the lowest Ra-228/Ra-226 activity ratio (0.31 +/- 0.09), followed by Appalachian CCRs (283 +/- 34 Bq/kg; 0.67 +/- 0.09), and Powder River CCRs (213 +/- 21 Bq/kg; 0.79 +/- 0.10). Total Ra and Ra-228/Ra-226 variations in CCRs correspond to the U and Th concentrations and ash contents of their feed coals, and we show that these relationships can be used to predict total NORM concentrations in CCRs. We observed differential NORM volatility during combustion that results in Pb-210 enrichment and (210)pb/Ra-226 ratios greater than 1 in most fly-ash samples. Overall, total NORM activities in CCRs are 7-10- and 3-5-fold higher than NORM activities in parent coals and average U.S. soil, respectively. This study lays the groundwork for future research related to the environmental and human health implications of CCR disposal and accidental release to the environment in the context of this elevated radioactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据